RSS

Literature Commentary: Invisible Man

(Originally published April 27, 2009)

After seeing selections from this book on the SAT and AP exams, I figured it was probably time to read Ralph Ellison’s modern classic “Invisible Man.” Normally, I’m not a big fan of “multicultural” literature, but I do believe in being sensitive toward other cultures and ethnic groups. So I promptly checked out “Invisible Man” from our library and packed it along to read during the campout this past weekend.

A brief note: this book is completely distinct from H. G. Wells’ science fiction novel “The Invisible Man.” There is no connection, despite the similar titles.

The book follows the titular Invisible Man, who is never given a name. The Invisible Man is a bright, hopeful African-American student with great ambitions for racial reconciliation. After witnessing firsthand the sharp conflict between blacks and whites – as well as between peaceful African-Americans and violent Black Nationalists – he hope to play a role in unifying a country that appears ever more sharply divided along racial lines. The Invisible Man goes on to settle in Harlem, where he joins an influential organization known as the Brotherhood. Using his oratorical skills, he quickly wins the respect of the black populace, yet draws ire from many of the rich white leaders of New York City.

But the seeds of racial hatred are already beginning to bear their ugly fruit. Enter the villain: a malevolent Black Nationalist calling himself Ras the Destroyer. As the book builds to its climax, Ras instigates a race riot in Harlem, and anarchy engulfs the borough. Despite the influence he has gained over much of the black population, the Invisible Man is powerless to stop the madness and destruction.

As the book concludes, the Invisible Man finds him trapped in a pitch-black coal cellar. To obtain light, he burns first his high school diploma, then several other papers that have had a formative effect upon his adult life. The symbolism here is obvious: all he has accomplished is futile, consumed in an instant by an insatiable, devouring force – the scourge of racial conflict. It’s a cold, bitter, brutal, and ultimately disheartening conclusion to a book that starts out grim and only gets worse from then on. The very last scene in the book is a nightmare in which the Invisible Man finds himself taunted, beaten, and finally emasculated by his enemies – both white and black. Harsh.

So is it worth reading?

Maybe, if you’re interested in gaining a better understanding of the racial struggles of the past. Ellison certainly does a good job of conveying the disillusionment experienced by the Invisible Man. But on the other hand…he fails to truly suggest any solution to the problems of discrimination and hatred. There is plenty of despair and misery in “Invisible Man”, but never any hope of a better future to come.

Then-Senator Barack Obama titled his most recent book, “The Audacity of Hope.” There is no “Hope” or “Yes, We Can” in Ellison’s monochromatic universe. There is Black, and there is White – a gap which is never successfully bridged by any major character. “Invisible Man” is dark and violent and very, very grim.

Not exactly pleasant bedtime reading.

(Note: “Invisible Man” contains strong language and extremely disturbing mature themes that put it off-limits for young or sensitive readers.)

VERDICT: 4/10
Well-written, but depressingly bleak and hopeless.

 
2 Comments

Posted by on August 31, 2009 in Contemporary

 

Literature Commentary: The Canterbury Tales

(Originally published April 14, 2009)

Wow. It has seriously been a long time since I posted a literature commentary…things have just been crazy with debate, schoolwork, etc. From now on I think I’ll keep these commentaries confined to works of classic literature only…so no more thriller reviews. 😉

Having seeing Chaucer’s classic “Canterbury Tales” on numerous “reading lists for college-bound students,” I figured it was time to read this work of poetry. After reading numerous “lighter” books, it was high time I once again enjoyed a classic.

“The Canterbury Tales” has gotten some bad press due to a few of the bawdier elements in some of the stories. Medieval crudities and adult humor are certainly present in several of the tales – most notably the “Miller’s Tale” and the “Reeve’s Tale.” These shortcomings, however, are more than overcome by the surpassing beauty of some of Chaucer’s other tales, especially the “Knight’s Tale” and the “Franklin’s Tale.”

Here’s an excerpt from the “Knight’s Tale” (and yes, this is the same “Knight’s Tale” from which Philip Rosenberger and Ethan Bonin derived their Duo last year 😉 ):

“Up spring the spears to twenty foot in height
Out go the long-swords flashing silver-bright
Hewing the helmets as they shear and shred
Out bursts the blood in streams of sternest red…”

As you can see, Chaucer doesn’t hold for any fluff about flowers and trees and the sun – his work is about the reality of medieval life, both good and bad.

Religion – more specifically the Christian faith – plays a prominent role in many of Chaucer’s stories. For the most part (with one exception), Christianity is treated with dignity and respect, and moral lessons play a large role in many of the tales. This is a fascinating look into the minds of medieval townspeople from all walks of life, and is perhaps the most interesting element of the “Canterbury Tales’

So is this book worth your time? Probably so, especially for fans of medievalism like myself. Do be aware that some of the stories are certainly not appropriate for most readers (in other words, skip the “Miller’s Tale” the “Reeve’s Tale” and the “Merchant’s Tale”). Duly warned, it is possible to richly enjoy Chaucer as one of medieval literature’s grandest poets.

VERDICT: 7/10
A work of exquisite poetry marred by some bawdy elements.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 31, 2009 in Classic