RSS

Movie Review: “Predators”

Are all men by nature monsters? What makes a human being any more than just a killing machine? Is survival of the fittest really the only form of morality in a chaotic world?

These are pretty weighty questions – not exactly what you expect to find in your average shoot-’em-up summer movie. But “Predators”, the latest installment in a franchise that dates back to the ’80s, somehow manages to address them – a philosophical twist that elevates it above many other films in its genre. Never having seen Arnold Schwarzenegger’s original “Predator,” I had no expectations going into this movie. I was hoping to see an intense, suspenseful, machismo-heavy action film. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it not only met my expectations…it exceeded them.

“Predators” begins with a group of hardened killers falling from the sky onto an alien planet. They come from all walks of life – a Yakuza mobster, a Mexican cartel enforcer, an executioner from Sierra Leone, a death row inmate, a Russian Spetznaz commando, etc. Ex-military mercenary Royce (Adrien Brody) quickly assumes the role of leader, backed up by Israeli Defense Force sniper Isabelle (Alice Braga). Apparently out of place is doctor Edwin (Topher Grace) who doesn’t seem to have the murderous history of the others. They quickly realize that they’re all inside an alien hunting preserve – and they are the game.

Cue the Predators – seven-foot-tall armored behemoths with highly advanced cloaking and infrared vision technology. The Predators have been using this planet as a means of testing their skills against Earth’s best killers, and they intend to hunt down the humans one by one. At this point, it would have been easy to let the film slip into the obvious “and-then-there-were-none” plot structure, throwing legitimate plot development to the wind in favor of gory kills. But fortunately, producer Robert Rodriguez and director Nimrod Antal toss in a few unique twists that makes “Predators” a little more memorable than others of its ilk.

For starters, the film answers the question. “What would long-term exposure to constant fear and killing do to a person’s mind?” Laurence Fishburne briefly appears as Noland, the psychologically warped survivor of a previous Predator killing spree.. His chilling performance evokes the character of Kurtz in Joseph Conrad’s novel “Heart of Darkness” – an individual who has abandoned the standards of civilization and embraced primitive savagery. Viewers are left to wonder whether he was really deranged from the start, or whether the constant imminence of death has brought out the beast within.

The fundamentally haunting question of the film is “Are we any different from the Predators?” And this theme pervades the entire film. At one point late in the movie, Royce is prepared to abandon an injured comrade to the Predators, using him as bait to draw the aliens. A horrified Isabelle chastises him with the question “Aren’t you human?” “No,” Royce growls. “I’m alive.” Which begs the question…if his only moral standard is the survival instinct, what makes him any different than the giant monsters hunting them?

Once again, it would have been very easy for the filmmakers to embrace convention and make Royce into a classic antihero – a hardened warrior who sacrifices everything in order to survive. But in a particularly gratifying turn, the movie ultimately rejects the concept of utilitarian ethics – using people as merely means to an end – in favor of compassion, honor, and self-sacrifice. This affirmation of conventional morality makes the dramatic ending especially satisfying, and left me feeling good as I left the theater.

From a technical standpoint, the film is reasonably well-made. The Predators are actual human beings in costumes, not CGI creations, which gives the film an element of visceral realism. Everything doesn’t feel like it was done in front of a green screen, which makes for a much more pleasant viewing experience. I should mention that the acting (with the exception of Grace and Fishburne) is fairly weak…there’s not a lot of time spent investing in characters that are going to be killed off. Brody tries hard to embrace his new “action-hero” role, but is never perfectly comfortable in that position. (I have difficulty getting rid of my perception of him as a “sensitive” actor…it’s kind of like what would happen if Colin Firth tried to portray Batman.)

The movie also does a remarkable job of catering to its target demographic – males between the ages of 18 and 25. This is not a movie that most girls will enjoy – it’s very much a masculine empowerment movie, and I found myself occasionally grinning at the sheer macho-ness of it. Even the Predators themselves look like they’ve been pulled from a video game, pumped full of muscle-builder formula, and and then fitted with “Star Wars” castoff equipment.

Unfortunately, the biggest problem with “Predators” is the fact that it is an R-rated sci-fi/horror film, with everything that necessarily involves. While much of the violence is directed against alien creatures (about three-quarters of the gore in the movie is glowing green Predator blood), there are still some shockingly graphic moments – including one particularly gruesome scene that had me cringing in my seat. And not all of the violence is between humans and aliens – humans do some pretty grisly things to each other as well. People end up getting killed with bullets, blades, energy weapons, grenades, mines, and claws…usually with plenty of bloodshed. (There’s also a lot of unnecessary language – 40-50 f-words throughout the course of the movie.) This is by no means a movie for anyone under 17 or 18 – it’s dark, intense, and at times pretty disturbing.

So, is it worth watching?

Many people would not like this movie. It’s not a film for the sensitive or easily disturbed – and most members of the female gender will dismiss it outright as a “guy thing.” And it is, in some ways. But it’s also a tightly plotted action film that isn’t afraid to address important questions – questions that can lead to a discussion of the nature of man, and what it is that makes humans more than merely “predators.” And that, in my mind, is a step forward for this genre.

VERDICT: 8/10
A dark, compelling blend of sci-fi, action, and suspense – with a philosophical touch that differentiates it from others of its kind.

Normalized Score: 5.8

WARNING: “Predators” is rated R for strong creature violence and gore, and pervasive language. This film contains graphic brutal violence, disturbing content, and strong language throughout. NOT recommended for viewers under 17.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 10, 2010 in Sci-Fi

 

Movie Review: “Jonah Hex”

I like most of the movies I see (which is why I almost never rank anything below a 5 on a scale of 1-10). Generally, I try to pick movies that are both culturally influential and well-made. Unfortunately, “Jonah Hex” is an exception to this rule. You’ve probably never heard of this movie – a Western-with-a-touch-of-the-supernatural. Apparently it was originally a graphic novel…which I can only hope is better than the awful film that bears its name.

The eponymous hero, Jonah Hex (Josh Brolin), is a horrifically scarred bounty hunter with a vendetta: the villainous Quentin Turnbull (a tragically underused John Malkovich), infuriated by Hex’s betrayal of his Confederate division during the Civil War, has killed his family. Near death, Jonah is rescued by the Crow Indians and bestowed with some sort of supernatural power to briefly reanimate the dead.

This all takes place within the first five minutes of the film. No further explanation whatsoever is given for Jonah’s bizarre powers.

A few years later, the presumed-dead Turnbull reappears with a new scheme: constructing a massive weapon allegedly developed by Eli Whitney. Yes, the inventor of the cotton gin himself…I’m sure he’s rolling over in his grave (no pun intended). The U.S. government promptly shows up at Jonah’s door, offering him a full pardon in return for his elimination of Turnbull. Predictably, Jonah sets off on a revenge odyssey that involves causing innumerable explosions and leaving a long trail of bodies behind him. But what action movie would be complete without a female lead? Enter Lilah (played with all the emotion of a brick wall by Megan Fox), a hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold who seems to be Jonah’s longtime lover.

I could spend hours enumerating the problems with this film…but I’ll try to be fairly succinct: this movie is a purposeless train wreck, with a plot that feels like it was written by a fourth-grader.

The storyline is just as confusing as you might expect. Zero time is spent on character development or emotional depth – this movie concentrates exclusively on burning down buildings and gunning down legions of supporting characters. Oh, and did I mention the explosions? Trains, boats, cities, buildings, living people, dead people, and undead people all get the dynamite treatment. I stopped counting after the fourth building was destroyed within the first twenty minutes.

There are also plenty of ridiculously over-the-top moments. I occasionally like stupid action-junkie movies, but this was too much even for me. Not only does Jonah ride a horse fitted with saddle-mounted Gatling guns, he also proceeds to utilize repeating crossbow-pistols that fire exploding arrows (I’m not making this up). Turnbull’s mystery weapon is ludicrously overpowered, utilizing technology that looks like it was cribbed from Star Wars. This movie is supposed to take place in the 1800s, after all.

But the weirdness doesn’t stop there. In a bizarre arena fight scene, a “snake man” with inhumanly large jaws and acidic spittle shows up for about two minutes with no explanation whatsoever. Twenty minutes later, an apparently injured Jonah is taken in by Native Americans who perform some kind of bizarre ritual involving a live crow flying out from Jonah’s throat. The final battle is an incoherent mishmash of violent hand-to-hand combat intercut with dream-sequence images, accompanied by a pounding heavy metal score. The movie is a constant stream of “what just happened?” sequences that defy all logic.

The acting is on par with the rest of the film – which is to say, pretty bad. Jonah Hex displays no personality whatsoever, instead relying on a series of tired revenge-film quips that add nothing to the movie. Quentin Turnbull, his arch-nemesis, is vaguely unthreatening – for most of the movie, he seems grumpy rather than murderous. And plenty has already been said about Megan Fox’s acting, so I’ll refrain from going into further detail.

And that brings up another, graver problem with “Jonah Hex”: the total and perverse objectification of the character Lilah. It’s one thing to have a strong female lead – it’s quite another to introduce a character whose sole purpose is to sexualize the tone of the movie. From the beginning of the film until its conclusion, Lilah’s wardrobe is limited to a very low-cut corset and stockings that leave most of her leg exposed. No time is ever spent investing in her character or exploring her intrinsic worth as a human being – she’s just there to show a lot of skin and titillate the young-male demographic that this film targets.

But perhaps most disturbingly of all is the way that the film appears to take twisted pleasure in throwing her into violent situations. Lilah is repeatedly slapped, leered at, beaten, and attacked with knives. And this isn’t some form of social commentary about the abuse of women – it’s seemingly included to appeal to the worst elements of the audience. This sexualization of the violence in “Jonah Hex” is highly inappropriate and fundamentally demeaning to women.

Worldview elements are murky at best. Native American mysticism is liberally sprinkled throughout the film, and the dead souls Jonah contacts are apparently suffering in hell. There isn’t a single ray of spiritual hope anywhere in the movie, which is a real tragedy. A film like this has the potential to explore significant issues…but “Jonah Hex” prefers to rely on a mashup of pop-spirituality and occultism.

So, should you see it?

In a word, no. It’s a total waste of time with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. After seeing a movie like “Toy Story 3” – which had strong characters and a meaningful story – a film like “Jonah Hex” just looks even more like the mindlessness that it is.

VERDICT: 1.5/10
One point for the semi-intriguing premise. Half a point because some of the explosions were reasonably entertaining. That’s it.

Normalized Score: 0.0

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 22, 2010 in Fantasy