RSS

Movie Review: “Sherlock Holmes – A Game of Shadows”

I wasn’t the biggest fan of 2009’s “Sherlock Holmes.” Sure, it had wit and pizzazz to spare (and Robert Downey Jr. was fantastic in the leading role) but overall, the film lacked a real emotional core. An expensive, slickly packaged product (I’m looking at you, “Transformers'”) does not a good film guarantee. Still, it was entertaining and clever…and good enough to justify a look at its sequel, “A Game of Shadows.”

Picking up shortly after “Sherlock Holmes,” “A Game of Shadows” pits Holmes and Watson (Jude Law) against the brilliant criminal mastermind Professor Moriarty (Jared Harris). Moriarty, much more of a Bond-villain type than the first film’s antagonist, has malevolent designs for all of Europe…and of course it falls to Holmes to save the day. Cue a series of elaborate set pieces involving hand-to-hand brawls, giant explosions, and slow-motion gun battles.

First, the good…

The relationship between Holmes and Watson is the true touchstone of the film. Their “bro-mantic” bond is at times both hilarious and touching – and it’s obvious they’re both willing to make great sacrifices for one another. This leads to another of the film’s strengths: it finally shows viewers a vulnerable Holmes. The brilliant, invincible genius of the first film takes a serious beating in the sequel, both physically and emotionally. Although some of these elements could have used better development, it’s still a step up from its predecessor.

The action scenes are also remarkably well-executed. A “bullet time” sequence in a snowy forest is particularly stunning, as are the (numerous) scenes in which Holmes rapidly plans out his techniques for dispatching an attacker. In a Hollywood that seems to rely more and more on recycling old clichés, it’s refreshing to see some creatively choreographed fisticuffs.

Most importantly, however, the last act of the film is simply sublime. Ritchie finally manages to integrate his story with Arthur Conan Doyle’s classic tales, resulting in a breathtaking climax that redeems the entire movie. It’s clever, tense, and yet heartfelt – an almost impossible balance to strike in a film like this, but Ritchie nails it. When the credits rolled, I found myself grinning ear to ear – as a longtime fan of Conan Doyle’s work, I appreciated such a brilliantly executed finale.

That’s not to say, however, that “A Game of Shadows” is perfect – not by a long shot.

The film is horribly paced. Viewers are hit with an incoherent barrage of action and plot exposition within the first half-hour, which quickly gives way to an agonizingly dull midsection. For much of the movie, the plot is borderline incomprehensible – things only become clear as the film reaches its conclusion.

Unfortunately, Ritchie can’t resist the temptation to insert a homoerotic subtext into the Holmes/Watson relationship. Though there’s nothing overtly questionable here, there’s plenty of wink-wink subtext pandering to a juvenile demographic (Holmes briefly shows up in drag, and a wrestling match between him and Watson results in clothes getting torn off). The director isn’t trying to make a creative point about the repression of homosexual rights throughout history…he’s going for adolescent sniggers.

Finally, the depiction of Moriarty is somewhat less intimidating than it should be. Without spoiling any major plot points, Moriarty’s motives are simply too simplistic for such a multifaceted character. Throughout Conan Doyle’s work, Moriarty is an entirely sociopathic master criminal who takes pleasure in thwarting the law. In the end, Ritchie’s Moriarty needs more Hannibal Lecter and less Gordon Gekko.

So, should you see it?

From a worldview standpoint, there’s little of note…aside from a particularly memorable quip by Moriarty that reflects a cynical – yet biblical – understanding of human nature. While fleeting, it’s more than viewers get from most hyperkinetic action films. And as previously noted, there’s the whole “gay” dynamic between Holmes and Watson, but that’s employed exclusively for lowbrow laughs.

When all’s said and done, the last twenty minutes of “A Game of Shadows” are so good that they make up for the film’s deficiencies. It’s good Christmas-break entertainment – there won’t be any Oscar nods here, but it’s still probably worth seeing for fans of the original.

VERDICT: 7/10
An imperfect yet entertaining sequel.

Normalized Score: 3.4

Addendum: Yes, there is a trailer for “The Dark Knight Rises.” Yes, it is spectacular.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 16, 2011 in Thrillers

 

Literature Commentary: Inheritance

As a fantasy-loving 14-year-old, few books stirred my imagination more than Christopher Paolini’s “Eragon” and “Eldest.” Not only were both novels rousing adventures, they were also authored by a former homeschooler just a few years older than me – inspiring for a young writer like me. I devoured both tomes (four times apiece) and eagerly anticipated the concluding installment.

Fast forward three years, and Paolini made a horribly misguided decision: splitting the final volume into two. After years of anticipation, “Brisingr” just fell flat. Not only was the writing not up to snuff with his previous work, “Brisingr” barely advanced the story and lapsed into tedious subplots. I wasn’t holding my breath for Book 4 – the story had become horribly predictable, and a half-rate conclusion was assured. Or so I thought.

It’s been three more years, but the quartet-concluding finale – “Inheritance” – has finally arrived. And I am happy to report that it vastly surpassed my expectations.

“Inheritance” picks up immediately after “Brisingr.” Young warrior Eragon and his mentally-linked dragon, Saphira, are finally beginning their campaign against evil King Galbatorix. Backed by a host of allies – elf princess Arya, rebel commander Nasuada, Eragon’s brawny cousin Roran, dwarf king Orik, and others – they press forward through enemy city after enemy city. And all the while, they must contend with Eragon’s half-brother Murtagh, a fallen Dragon Rider allied with Galbatorix.

It all sounds terribly clichéd to anyone who’s read much fantasy. And the first 500 pages of “Inheritance” (it’s a colossal 850-page volume) are a predictable slog. Most of the major plot elements here have been clear almost from the start of the series. Good guys fight enemies, suffer a few minor struggles along the way, and approach the final battle. And on and on it goes. I wasn’t holding my breath for anything spectacular.

But as the book hits its third act, the story suddenly explodes into pulse-pounding life. A series of clever, expectation-defying twists is thrown in, leading to a thrilling and deeply satisfying climax. Characters are forced to use more than brute strength to accomplish their goals – a refreshing departure from what I expected. Reading the last half of “Inheritance,” I felt like a young teenager enjoying “Eragon” for the first time. The magic and wonder of Paolini’s fantasy universe finally blossoms, and the plot takes some surprisingly mature directions. The fact is, this is an exciting final chapter, and I certainly didn’t expect to be as riveted as I was.

From a stylistic standpoint, the book is unfortunately weighed down by Paolini’s poor writing. Particularly in the first half of the book, I found myself stopping mid-paragraph to marvel at the ineptness of Paolini’s prose (and, for that matter, his editor). “Inheritance” too often dissolves into a rush of “thesaurian” words, overwrought similes, and badly constructed sentences. (It’s worth noting, though, that by the end I wasn’t distracted by this anymore – maybe I was too engaged in the story, or maybe the writing simply gets better as the book goes on).

“Inheritance” is also crippled by bloat – the same sort of bloat that afflicts almost all of Robert Jordan’s later work. There comes a time when every writer must sacrifice subplots and extraneous characters in the name of the greater story. If that has to be done by killing off unneeded characters, so be it. These elements shouldn’t have been there in the first place unless they advance the plot somehow. In retrospect, virtually all of “Brisingr” should have been sent to the chopping block, as well as a good third of “Inheritance.” There is no reason – short of wanton profit-mongering – that this series needed to extend across four huge books.

(Aside: With all due respect to Paolini, the wait time between books has been completely unreasonable. If Terry Brooks and Ted Dekker can crank out multiple, well-written 400-page novels within one year, more than three years is ridiculous for an 850-page book. Just had to get that off my chest…)

One of the great strengths of Paolini’s writing, however, is his fascinating attention to cultural details. Occasionally, “Inheritance” lapses into beautiful moments of deep reverie. The joy and mystery of an undiscovered world shines through, drawing the reader’s attention away from dull political diatribes and endless spell casting. Throughout “Inheritance,” clever little touches are thrown in – the legend of an ancient tribal hero, for instance, or an indestructible sword crafted from “the archetype of an inclined plane” – that keep the book worth reading. Paolini might not be a very good writer of political intrigue, but he’s an outstanding world-builder.

There are some interesting worldview touches sprinkled throughout the entire series. “Eragon” briefly mentions the beliefs of Eragon’s fellow villagers (a kind of primitive animism), while “Eldest” highlights the atheism of the elves. The polytheistic dwarves get their turn in “Brisingr” – culminating with what seems to be the manifestation of a deity at a dwarven coronation ceremony. In “Inheritance,” the spotlight turns to rebel leader Nasuada’s monotheism. Unfortunately, these elements never get the development they deserve. They’re thrown in as offhanded references rather than plot touchstones, which may unintentionally reflect the series’ humanistic tone. By the end, Eragon adopts a sort of loose agnosticism – preferring to live a long life and die peacefully rather than pursue the eternal life offered by faith. It’s never quite clear where exactly Paolini stands on matters of religion and spirituality. (Some readers may wish to note that there’s a ton of magic and pseudo-occultism throughout the series, but it’s never portrayed as an alternative worldview system).

Objectionable content comes in the form of sustained fantasy violence (often bloody) and some nightmarish torture sequences. (If you don’t know what a degloving injury is, rest assured, you will after “Inheritance”). It’s certainly more graphic than other young adult fantasy, but probably wouldn’t run afoul of a PG-13 rating. This is not “The Hunger Games,” and the combat here packs far less of a punch. There’s no sexual content to speak of, and only one or two mild profanities.

If, like me, you’ve been reading Paolini’s novels from a young age, you owe it to yourself to pick up “Inheritance.” “Brisingr” might have been a letdown, but “Inheritance” is a fine conclusion to a relatively strong series. Sure, it’s flawed – pretty badly in some respects – but it has a lot to recommend it nonetheless. By the end, I was thoroughly enjoying “Inheritance” – once it defied my expectations, I was content to sit back and enjoy the ride. Adult fans of fantasy will likely find Paolini’s work deficient and derivative, but longtime fans will find much to like here.

It’s not “Harry Potter,” nor is it “The Hunger Games.” But it’s still pretty good.

VERDICT: 7.5/10
A surprisingly strong conclusion to a long-running epic.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 17, 2011 in Fantasy