RSS

Book Review: “Then Sings My Soul, Book 3”

I come from a worship tradition that emphasizes the great hymns of old. You wouldn’t find electric guitars or backing vocalists at my home church…rather, our congregation (Lutheran – Missouri Synod) focuses primarily on traditional instrumentation and traditional songs.

Fast forward a few years and I’m attending a Christian college where few students are familiar with these hymns. Most of my classmates are more comfortable with Chris Tomlin, Hillsong United, and Matt Redman than Fanny Crosby, Isaac Watts, and Charles Wesley. As one might expect, this was a relatively abrupt transition.

It is the dichotomy between old and new worship traditions that Robert Morgan has sought to address in his series “Then Sings My Soul.” Fortunately for new readers such as myself, each book is a stand-alone work. This one is divided into four sections: first, an overview of Christian hymnody through the centuries (from Biblical to modern times); second, a series of short backstories for a variety of hymns; third, several extended accounts detailing the composition of six well-loved hymns; and fourth, two essays on the role of hymns in private and public life.

This four-part structure occasionally gives the book a disjointed feel, but to be fair, this work probably wasn’t intended to be read in one sitting. As a daily devotional, I’m sure it would be outstanding. Numerous brief vignettes describe the history behind well-loved hymns (“How Great Thou Art,” “Blessed Assurance,” etc.) while offering devotional commentary and ideas for implementation into worship.

The book really picks up energy, however, in its latter half. Several fascinating extended anecdotes shed light on the origins of still more classic hymns – for instance, one tells the story of Horatio Spafford (author of “It Is Well”), providing information not often included in modern accounts. Throughout the book, it is abundantly clear that Morgan has done his homework – detailed background material is constantly offered.

The book’s concluding essay, “Old New Praise,” is one of the best and most cogent pieces on church music that I’ve ever read. Morgan calls for “interwoven worship” that blends the great hymns of Christian history with the contemporary praise songs of today. He indicts the recent tendency toward separating “traditional” and “contemporary” worship styles, recognizing that value and significance may be found in both. Instead, Morgan calls for a synthesis: retaining the greatest hymns of the past while embracing modern songs. In response to criticism that modern praise music lacks depth, Morgan simply points to the thousands of shallow hymns that have been produced throughout Christian history (not all classic English hymns are on par with “Amazing Grace”!). Present-day hymns with legitimate value, Morgan contends, will survive – but it will take time to sift them out.

Is “Then Sings My Soul” worth buying?

As a historical work, the book is intriguing but may be too superficial for some (it treats many hymns in a page or less). As a devotional work for longtime lovers of the hymnody, however, it succeeds marvelously. Morgan also offers a balanced vision for church music that may be reasonably embraced by both traditionalists and modernists. At the very least, it’s well worth a read – church librarians would be advised to consider buying a copy. Morgan’s love for the classic hymns of the past is contagious…and it’s a love that today’s Christian leaders would be well served to share.

VERDICT: 8/10
An informative, well-written exploration of Christian hymnody through the centuries.

* I received this book free from Thomas Nelson Publishers as part of their BookSneeze.com book review bloggers program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 5, 2012 in Historical

 

Movie Review: “Act of Valor”

If you have ever longed for a “Call of Duty” film, look no further.

“Act of Valor,” the recent military action film starring “active duty Navy SEALs” is a fast-paced, patriotic action film that recalls a simpler era of moviemaking. Here, viewers won’t find angsty meditations on the implications of Bush-era foreign policy – this is simply a movie about the men who defend our nation from “enemies foreign and domestic.” And as such, it succeeds.

The plot will be familiar to anyone who’s played one of the “Modern Warfare” games: SEALs are dispatched to rescue a captured CIA operative in Colombia, but it soon becomes clear that an international conspiracy is developing. Russian smuggler and arms broker Christo has allied with radical jihadist and Chechen leader Al-Shabal, and the two men are plotting acts of terror on the U.S. home front. Through a series of globe-hopping missions, the SEALs confront – and eliminate – a variety of terrorist cell groups.

First, the positives…

The action scenes are stunning. “Act of Valor” is one of the best-made shoot-’em-up films I’ve seen in a long time, particularly in terms of cinematography and staging. Key sequences contain plenty of frenetic energy, but it’s never difficult to tell exactly what is happening onscreen. Every inch of the film is suffused with brutal realism, right down to the live ammunition used in many of the combat scenes. In terms of action execution, “Act of Valor” is head-and-shoulders above “The Expendables,” “RED,” or “The A-Team.”

“Act of Valor,” however, isn’t perfect. As many other critics have observed, the acting is remarkably poor. I recognize that the stars of this film are Navy SEALs, not trained actors, but the lifeless lead performances are distractingly bad. Tom Hanks and Mel Gibson might be able to infuse “corny” lines with dramatic power, but that just doesn’t happen here. And unfortunately, weak acting does detract somewhat from the movie’s emotional climax.

The worldview portrayed by “Act of Valor” is remarkably black-and-white: bad people threaten America, SEALs kill bad people. Though I’m often exasperated by political correctness, it’s worth noting that all of the villains fall into one of six categories: black people, Filipino people, Jewish people, Mexican people, Colombian people, and Arab people. In contrast, most of the SEALs (including the two leads) are Caucasian. I would have liked, for example, to have some of the villains be disaffected Anglo-American teenagers who’ve bought into a mindset of hate. Maybe I’m nitpicking, but a little more nuance wouldn’t have hurt.

These faults, however, are ultimately beside the point. “Act of Valor” is a hymn to the courage and self-sacrifice of our top soldiers – and on that level, it succeeds with flying colors. Sitting in the theater, I found myself thinking “I hope other nations are watching this.” Our military succeeds not merely because of technology, but also because of the character of those on the front line. In our affluent country, there are plenty of spoiled, upper-class college kids whining about whether or not it was right to take out Osama bin Laden…I don’t see any of them stepping up to lay their lives on the line. Americans can live free from terrorism because of soldiers’ heroism – and that’s a point “Act of Valor” certainly brings home.

Objectionable content comes in the form of violence (many people are shot in the head with some blood spray, and there’s a brief scene of the CIA operative being tortured) and a fair amount of strong language. Compared to a lot of recent war films, though, it’s rather restrained.

Is it worth watching?

“Act of Valor” lacks the emotional punch of “Saving Private Ryan” or “We Were Soldiers.” But as a testament to the bravery of America’s finest, it’s outstanding. There are definitely some problems – particularly with the script and acting – but when weighed against the superbly rendered action scenes, these are mitigated. Fans of action and military films alike will likely enjoy “Act of Valor.”

VERDICT: 8/10
A rousing, patriotic action film. Imperfect, but succeeds in being both entertaining and moving.

Normalized Score: 5.8

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 5, 2012 in Thrillers