RSS

Yearly Archives: 2010

Movie Review: “Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief”

As a fan of both the Harry Potter films and books, I was both pleased and saddened to learn that the “Deathly Hallows” movie is currently in production. I was glad that my favorite volume in the series is under development…but also, a little sad that it’s the last installment in the saga. Fortunately, it appears that a worthy successor is beginning to emerge…

Enter Percy Jackson – a normal kid, who just happens to be the son of the Greek god Poseidon.

“Percy Jackson and the Olympians,” the best-selling fantasy series authored by Rick Riordan, has been heralded as “the next Harry Potter.” While it isn’t quite up to the level of J.K. Rowling’s magnum opus, the series is a fast-paced, witty retelling of Greek myths in the context of modern society. Zeus, Poseidon, Hera, and the rest have all vacated Mount Olympus and taken up residence in the Empire State Building, where they attempt to influence the course of human history and stave off the attacks of predatory monsters. (I’ll address the very obvious worldview implications later on)

The titular character, Perseus Jackson (played effectively by Logan Lerman), is the half-divine (demigod) son of Poseidon and a mortal woman. When his lineage becomes clear, he and his mother are attacked by a vicious harpy and a savage minotaur. This latter skirmish results in the apparent death of Percy’s mother.

After a prolonged battle with the minotaur, Percy and his loyal bodyguard Grover (a satyr) find themselves in Camp Half-Blood, a hidden forest installation that somewhat resembles a Boy Scout ranch. Under the kindly guidance of the centaur Chiron (Pierce Brosnan), young demigods from all around the world are taught how to use their innate powers to battle the monsters that wish humanity harm.

But Percy doesn’t have much time to learn. Zeus’ master weapon – his lightning bolt – has been stolen, and Percy (as the son of Zeus’ brother and rival, Poseidon) is the prime suspect. Now, Percy must find a way to both rescue his mother and recover the stolen bolt before war breaks out between the gods.

Accompanied by Grover the satyr and a feisty daughter of Athena named Annabeth, Percy begins a quest that takes him across the United States in search of some answers. They battle Medusa (Uma Thurman) in a garden-statue emporium (using a shiny iPod touch in place of a reflective shield), and square off with the fire-breathing Hydra of Lerna in Nashville. A casino in Las Vegas stands in for the Island of the Lotus-Eaters, and the fabled Hollywood sign serves as a hidden gateway to Hades. (Irony much?) Wry pop culture references abound, giving the film a don’t-take-this-too-seriously attitude that appeals to viewers young and old.

It’s a smart, well-paced movie that deserves far better reviews than it’s received. Fans of Harry Potter or of Greek mythology in general will not be disappointed. There are a few changes to Rick Riordan’s source material, but they generally serve to add clarity.

At first glance, it sounds like there are a lot of worldview considerations – especially considering the whole issue of the “gods.” However, “Percy Jackson” neatly sidesteps any potential religious debates by making the Greek deities merely stand-ins for classic superheroes. They’re neither omnipotent nor omniscient, and really don’t come across as representatives of an anti-Christian worldview. Zeus and Poseidon really don’t wield any more power than Electro or Aquaman, and they struggle with very human weaknesses.

(It is worth noting, however, that the realm of Hades is a terrifying, Dante-esque vision of the biblical hell, not the quiet, shadowy otherworld portrayed in the original myths.)

Gods and superheroes aside, however, there are undeniably supernatural aspects to this film. Those who disagree with Harry Potter on principle probably shouldn’t see this movie. I personally didn’t find it offensive, but I can understand that some might.

My biggest criticism of “Percy Jackson” is not directed at its makers, but rather at the MPAA members who gave it a PG rating. This is quite possibly the “edgiest” PG movie I have ever seen. The violence and scary images are fast and furious, there’s a fair amount of language, and there are a few innuendoes tossed in as well. Don’t go into this movie thinking you’ll see something along the lines of “The Incredibles” or even the earlier Harry Potter movies – “Percy Jackson” is not suitable for children under the age of ten.

That said, however, it’s still a well-made, exciting movie. It definitely has its flaws, but most older viewers will not find them especially problematic. I would recommend “Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief” to teen and adult viewers who enjoy the Harry Potter series or are fans of Greek mythology.

It’s not perfect. But it’s still pretty good.

VERDICT: 8/10
An occasionally intense, but creative and well-executed, cinematic fantasy.

Normalized Score: 5.8

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 21, 2010 in Fantasy

 

Movie Review: “The Book of Eli”

The world has ended. Again. Marauding gangs haunt the ashen wastelands of America, preying on innocent passersby. The few survivors have clumped together into ramshackle settlements that are beginning to crumble from within. Into this world steps machete-wielding road warrior Eli – a man on a mission from God.

At first it sounds wholly derivative…and then, entirely incongruous. Postapocalyptic films and literature in recent years have, for the most part, remained devoid of overt spirituality. Books like “The City of Ember” and “The Road”, while they may acknowledge a dim sense of spirituality or hope, generally steer clear of explicit Christian references. But Denzel Washington’s latest film, “The Book of Eli” unapologetically confronts issues of faith, sacrifice, and, most notably, the Bible.

That’s right – the Bible is the titular “Book.” And without ever veering toward the “preachy”, directors Albert and Allen Hughes seamlessly develop the concept into a dark, emotional masterpiece.

As the film opens, Eli is traveling west across a burned-out America, carrying a machete, a pistol, a canteen…and the last known Bible on earth. He is taking the Book to a place where it will be “safe” – where its message can be finally be shared with the world. But Carnegie (Gary Oldman), the power-hungry dictator of a decrepit survivor’s colony, is also interested in Eli’s Book – for very different reasons. Carnegie believes that the power of the Bible’s words will give him an effective means of manipulating his citizenry…in effect, he hopes to twist the words of Scripture to crush his opposition.

Carnegie initially tries to lure Eli into complacency, distracting him from his divine mission. He sends a young girl, Solara (Mila Kunis), to Eli’s room in an attempt to seduce him. (He turns her down, of course). But during their brief interlude, Eli introduces Solara to the concept of prayer – a concept that quickly draws Carnegie’s attention. From then on, Carnegie begins an insane quest to capture the Book at all costs – even if it means killing dozens of other people in the process.

It’s a tight, fast-paced plot that effectively balances both its spiritual underpinnings and intense action sequences. But is it worth watching?

First, the good:

I have never seen another secular, mass-market film with such a reverence for the Word of God. Scenes in which Eli defends the Book with his life are extremely convicting as a Christian, and thought-provoking for nonbelievers. Even better, through several memorable scenes, Eli begins to show Solara the power of the Bible – not as a tool for conquest, but as a handbook for living. Psalms and Bible verses are quoted throughout the movie, and Christian imagery and symbolism are present in many scenes.

For that matter, Eli is something of a modern-day Elijah. His dangerous (and often self-sacrificial) mission, inspired by God and rooted in a deep-seated personal faith, is certainly inspiring. He obviously struggles with his own personal failings, but, for the most part, acts according to the Book he defends so vehemently.

That “defense” is, unfortunately, the source of most of the negative elements in this film.

This is a violent movie – a VERY violent movie. Within the first ten minutes, Eli dismembers, stabs, and decapitates six attacking thugs with his trusty machete – and things only ratchet up from there. (Plenty of blood and gore accompany all the killings). It’s implied that the roving gangs rape, murder, and then cannibalize their victims – horrific imagery that’s often depicted onscreen (along with Eli’s righteous revenge). There’s a fair amount of language as well, including about 10 uses of the f-word. This postapocalyptic universe is frighteningly visceral, and viewers see it in all its ugliness.

It’s left unclear whether Eli is really acting in a “Christian” way by brutally killing his enemies. To his credit, he does attempt to warn any would-be ambushers (“Don’t touch me again if you want to keep that hand!”), but quickly proceeds to dispatch anyone who threatens him. Whether or not these actions (albeit in self-defense) are consistent with “Christian love” is certainly a matter for debate.

But through all the nightmare and horror, light still shines. The Word of God is “living and active,” and this film effectively portrays its power in an ever-darkening world.

Should you see it?

I would not recommend “The Book of Eli” for any young or sensitive viewers. There’s just too much nightmarish material onscreen – from bloodthirsty motorcycle gangs to towns filled with decaying corpses. I would, however, recommend it for older teens and adults interested in seeing one of the most compelling portrayals of Christian faith in modern secular cinema.

VERDICT: 9.5/10
A compelling, thought-provoking postapocalyptic epic.

Normalized Score: 8.7

WARNING: “The Book of Eli” is rated R for brutal violence and language. This film is intense, dark, and frequently disturbing. NOT recommended for viewers under 17.

 
7 Comments

Posted by on February 6, 2010 in Contemporary