RSS

Monthly Archives: June 2010

Movie Review: “Jonah Hex”

I like most of the movies I see (which is why I almost never rank anything below a 5 on a scale of 1-10). Generally, I try to pick movies that are both culturally influential and well-made. Unfortunately, “Jonah Hex” is an exception to this rule. You’ve probably never heard of this movie – a Western-with-a-touch-of-the-supernatural. Apparently it was originally a graphic novel…which I can only hope is better than the awful film that bears its name.

The eponymous hero, Jonah Hex (Josh Brolin), is a horrifically scarred bounty hunter with a vendetta: the villainous Quentin Turnbull (a tragically underused John Malkovich), infuriated by Hex’s betrayal of his Confederate division during the Civil War, has killed his family. Near death, Jonah is rescued by the Crow Indians and bestowed with some sort of supernatural power to briefly reanimate the dead.

This all takes place within the first five minutes of the film. No further explanation whatsoever is given for Jonah’s bizarre powers.

A few years later, the presumed-dead Turnbull reappears with a new scheme: constructing a massive weapon allegedly developed by Eli Whitney. Yes, the inventor of the cotton gin himself…I’m sure he’s rolling over in his grave (no pun intended). The U.S. government promptly shows up at Jonah’s door, offering him a full pardon in return for his elimination of Turnbull. Predictably, Jonah sets off on a revenge odyssey that involves causing innumerable explosions and leaving a long trail of bodies behind him. But what action movie would be complete without a female lead? Enter Lilah (played with all the emotion of a brick wall by Megan Fox), a hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold who seems to be Jonah’s longtime lover.

I could spend hours enumerating the problems with this film…but I’ll try to be fairly succinct: this movie is a purposeless train wreck, with a plot that feels like it was written by a fourth-grader.

The storyline is just as confusing as you might expect. Zero time is spent on character development or emotional depth – this movie concentrates exclusively on burning down buildings and gunning down legions of supporting characters. Oh, and did I mention the explosions? Trains, boats, cities, buildings, living people, dead people, and undead people all get the dynamite treatment. I stopped counting after the fourth building was destroyed within the first twenty minutes.

There are also plenty of ridiculously over-the-top moments. I occasionally like stupid action-junkie movies, but this was too much even for me. Not only does Jonah ride a horse fitted with saddle-mounted Gatling guns, he also proceeds to utilize repeating crossbow-pistols that fire exploding arrows (I’m not making this up). Turnbull’s mystery weapon is ludicrously overpowered, utilizing technology that looks like it was cribbed from Star Wars. This movie is supposed to take place in the 1800s, after all.

But the weirdness doesn’t stop there. In a bizarre arena fight scene, a “snake man” with inhumanly large jaws and acidic spittle shows up for about two minutes with no explanation whatsoever. Twenty minutes later, an apparently injured Jonah is taken in by Native Americans who perform some kind of bizarre ritual involving a live crow flying out from Jonah’s throat. The final battle is an incoherent mishmash of violent hand-to-hand combat intercut with dream-sequence images, accompanied by a pounding heavy metal score. The movie is a constant stream of “what just happened?” sequences that defy all logic.

The acting is on par with the rest of the film – which is to say, pretty bad. Jonah Hex displays no personality whatsoever, instead relying on a series of tired revenge-film quips that add nothing to the movie. Quentin Turnbull, his arch-nemesis, is vaguely unthreatening – for most of the movie, he seems grumpy rather than murderous. And plenty has already been said about Megan Fox’s acting, so I’ll refrain from going into further detail.

And that brings up another, graver problem with “Jonah Hex”: the total and perverse objectification of the character Lilah. It’s one thing to have a strong female lead – it’s quite another to introduce a character whose sole purpose is to sexualize the tone of the movie. From the beginning of the film until its conclusion, Lilah’s wardrobe is limited to a very low-cut corset and stockings that leave most of her leg exposed. No time is ever spent investing in her character or exploring her intrinsic worth as a human being – she’s just there to show a lot of skin and titillate the young-male demographic that this film targets.

But perhaps most disturbingly of all is the way that the film appears to take twisted pleasure in throwing her into violent situations. Lilah is repeatedly slapped, leered at, beaten, and attacked with knives. And this isn’t some form of social commentary about the abuse of women – it’s seemingly included to appeal to the worst elements of the audience. This sexualization of the violence in “Jonah Hex” is highly inappropriate and fundamentally demeaning to women.

Worldview elements are murky at best. Native American mysticism is liberally sprinkled throughout the film, and the dead souls Jonah contacts are apparently suffering in hell. There isn’t a single ray of spiritual hope anywhere in the movie, which is a real tragedy. A film like this has the potential to explore significant issues…but “Jonah Hex” prefers to rely on a mashup of pop-spirituality and occultism.

So, should you see it?

In a word, no. It’s a total waste of time with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. After seeing a movie like “Toy Story 3” – which had strong characters and a meaningful story – a film like “Jonah Hex” just looks even more like the mindlessness that it is.

VERDICT: 1.5/10
One point for the semi-intriguing premise. Half a point because some of the explosions were reasonably entertaining. That’s it.

Normalized Score: 0.0

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 22, 2010 in Fantasy

 

Movie Review: “Toy Story 3”

“Toy Story 2” was the second movie I ever saw in theaters…I was about 8 at the time, and was totally entranced by the adventures of Woody, Buzz Lightyear, Jessie, and the rest of the memorable gang from Andy’s room. Although a lot of the emotional complexity was lost on me, I could still appreciate that it was more than just another animated kiddie-movie.

Ever since its inception, Pixar has had a knack for crafting brilliantly complex stories with cross-cutting demographic appeal. “Finding Nemo,” “The Incredibles,” “Up”…the list goes on and on. But “Toy Story” has been, perhaps, the most beloved Pixar series of all – a poignant series exploring issues of loss, abandonment, loyalty, and friendship. And “Toy Story 3,” the most recent entry in the franchise, is the outstanding crown jewel of this groundbreaking trilogy.

“Toy Story 3” begins with an action-scene spoof that’s really being played out in Andy’s imagination. It’s a charming introduction to a film that soon takes a surprisingly melancholy turn…Andy’s heading off to college, and the long-neglected toys are searching for some sort of relevance. After a narrow escape from the dreaded trash truck, they end up at the seemingly wonderful Sunnyside Daycare Center, where the strawberry-scented Lots o’ Hugging Bear (Lotso for short) offers them a permanent place to stay.

Unfortunately, Sunnyside turns out to be more of a prison than a paradise. Courageous cowboy Woody takes it upon himself to rescue his friends from Lotso’s sinister scheme – evoking imagery reminiscent of “Mission: Impossible” or “The Great Escape.”

I won’t say any more for fear of giving away plot elements…but suffice it to say that the film takes a series of very unexpected turns that are both unsettling and deeply moving.

I’ll start with the obvious: this is a fairly dark children’s movie. Most of the under-fives who see this movie will not be able to understand the underlying emotional complexity of the film, and thus will be disturbed by some of the scenes in the movie’s final act. Themes of death, sacrifice, and growing up aren’t exactly typical G-movie fare.

And parts of this film are truly heart-wrenching. Few movies have ever touched me as deeply as “Toy Story 3” did in its final moments. For a story about computer-animated toys, it elicits an unbelievable emotional impact. And that’s probably because it addresses such universal issues – a key reason for the series’ enduring popularity among children, teens, and adults alike. Pixar takes a step beyond the stereotypical or predictable “happy ending” by never flinching from the realities of life. In the context of a fantastical film, that’s a difficult balance to strike.

That’s not to say it doesn’t have its funny moments, though, because it does. Chief among these is a hilarious sequence in which space ranger Buzz Lightyear’s programming is reset to Spanish, transforming him into a mashup of Space Ranger and Zorro. A couple of new characters (Ken and Barbie) add a comic-romantic element to the series that ends up being immensely amusing (the mild innuendo present in the trailer is, for the most part, absent – the movie relies on clever humor rather than entendres and scatological humor).

Worldview elements are practically nonexistent. This movie is beautiful in its innocent simplicity – while characters behave in a way consistent with Christian principles of love and loyalty, the issue of God is never raised.

So, is it worth seeing?

I’ll admit that at first, it sounded like another little-kid movie. Happily, I was completely mistaken. This is a touching film that strikes a deep chord within the human soul – our need to be loved and accepted, and the pain of moving on to new stages of life. I wouldn’t take a four-year-old to see it, but I found it to be truly outstanding. Definitely one of Pixar’s finest pieces, and absolutely worth watching.

This one’s highly recommended.

VERDICT: 9/10
A near-flawless blend of humor, excitement, and emotional resonance.

Normalized Score: 7.9

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 19, 2010 in Fantasy