RSS

Monthly Archives: February 2010

Literature Commentary: Gone with the Wind

The name immediately evokes visions of the antebellum South, and of Scarlett O’Hara boldly declaring “I’ll never be hungry again!” For many Americans, Margaret Mitchell’s classic historical novel of the Civil War is inextricably linked to the epic 1939 film starring Clark Gable and Vivien Leigh. In both its paper and celluloid forms, it’s a story of love, war, decadence, and tragedy, as millions of viewers and readers have come to learn. After a fellow literature lover suggested I read the full novel, I promptly checked it out from the library.

“Gone with the Wind” is the story of Scarlett O’Hara, a flirtatious Southern belle with a consuming “love” for the seemingly unattainable Ashley Wilkes. But before she can put her romantic plans into action, the Civil War comes knocking on her doorstep. In a matter of months, she is forced to watch as her home and country come crashing down around her, thanks to Union General Sherman’s invasion of Georgia. Desperately trying to save her plantation, Tara, Scarlett hardens physically and emotionally – embracing a cold pragmatism that seems to offer dim hope for the future.

But “Gone with the Wind” isn’t just a history textbook – at its heart, it’s a story about people and their motivations. Throughout the course of the novel, Scarlett’s unreasonable passion for Ashley is offset by depictions of the true, sincere love between Ashley and his wife Melanie. And of course there’s the romantic scoundrel Rhett Butler, the one man who truly loves Scarlett for who she is…and the one man who eventually refuses to submit to her.

From a stylistic standpoint, it’s a masterful, sweeping epic that manages to balance romance and historical drama without coming off as hackneyed. Author Mitchell’s prose clips along at a rapid pace that never feels dull or sluggish. Despite the length of the novel (my unabridged version topped out at 1035 pages), “Gone with the Wind” doesn’t lag. (For the record, the movie adaptation is, for the most part, quite faithful to the book – but the book is definitely better.)

“Gone with the Wind” is told entirely from Scarlett’s viewpoint – a narrative choice that allows the reader to more effectively understand her motivations. Several cringe-worthy moments throughout the story leave one wishing they could warn Scarlett where her destructive behavior is leading…and the theme of actions breeding consequences is fully developed throughout. Scarlett’s single-minded pursuit of hedonistic self-interest leads to her alienation from respectable society – but there’s still a small element of reader sympathy that persists throughout the book, even during her worst periods. In this sense, “Gone with the Wind” is quite effective – it doesn’t portray her as a greedy, self-centered monster, but rather as a hardened spirit in need of redemption. (Whether or not that redemption ever takes place is an interesting question, and one that many readers and authors have tried to answer.)

The emotional core of the story is the love triangle between Scarlett, Rhett, and Ashley. Scarlett is obsessed with Ashley for the sole reason that she cannot have him. Moreover, he represents the lost ideal of the Southern gentleman – a sort of bewildered knight left behind by an evolving world. Sharply contrasting with Ashley is the dynamic Rhett – a scalawag who’s willing to do anything to survive. In this respect, he and Scarlett are evenly matched. They’re both determined to prevail against seemingly unbearable odds, and are willing to sacrifice principles in order to do so. Scarlett is obviously more compatible with Rhett, and by the end of the book realizes it…but her revelation comes too late.

From a worldview standpoint, there are some interesting aspects to “Gone with the Wind.” Early on, Scarlett expresses a longing for the quiet, serene faith of her deceased mother – but rapidly proceeds to behave in a completely different manner. Several times during the story, she expresses a brief interest in religion (primarily as a means of self-preservation…she fears that her actions will lead to eternal damnation). Whether or not she truly repents and reforms by the end of the book is left unclear.

So should you read it?

There’s a reason for this book’s enduring popularity. “Gone with the Wind” is a masterpiece of American literature, and highly recommended to readers of Civil War fiction or those who enjoy historical drama. While it’s undeniably a long book, its swift pacing, powerful characters, and insightful observations on human nature make it well worth your time.

VERDICT: 8/10
A must-read for students of American literature.

 
5 Comments

Posted by on February 26, 2010 in Classic

 

Movie Review: “Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief”

As a fan of both the Harry Potter films and books, I was both pleased and saddened to learn that the “Deathly Hallows” movie is currently in production. I was glad that my favorite volume in the series is under development…but also, a little sad that it’s the last installment in the saga. Fortunately, it appears that a worthy successor is beginning to emerge…

Enter Percy Jackson – a normal kid, who just happens to be the son of the Greek god Poseidon.

“Percy Jackson and the Olympians,” the best-selling fantasy series authored by Rick Riordan, has been heralded as “the next Harry Potter.” While it isn’t quite up to the level of J.K. Rowling’s magnum opus, the series is a fast-paced, witty retelling of Greek myths in the context of modern society. Zeus, Poseidon, Hera, and the rest have all vacated Mount Olympus and taken up residence in the Empire State Building, where they attempt to influence the course of human history and stave off the attacks of predatory monsters. (I’ll address the very obvious worldview implications later on)

The titular character, Perseus Jackson (played effectively by Logan Lerman), is the half-divine (demigod) son of Poseidon and a mortal woman. When his lineage becomes clear, he and his mother are attacked by a vicious harpy and a savage minotaur. This latter skirmish results in the apparent death of Percy’s mother.

After a prolonged battle with the minotaur, Percy and his loyal bodyguard Grover (a satyr) find themselves in Camp Half-Blood, a hidden forest installation that somewhat resembles a Boy Scout ranch. Under the kindly guidance of the centaur Chiron (Pierce Brosnan), young demigods from all around the world are taught how to use their innate powers to battle the monsters that wish humanity harm.

But Percy doesn’t have much time to learn. Zeus’ master weapon – his lightning bolt – has been stolen, and Percy (as the son of Zeus’ brother and rival, Poseidon) is the prime suspect. Now, Percy must find a way to both rescue his mother and recover the stolen bolt before war breaks out between the gods.

Accompanied by Grover the satyr and a feisty daughter of Athena named Annabeth, Percy begins a quest that takes him across the United States in search of some answers. They battle Medusa (Uma Thurman) in a garden-statue emporium (using a shiny iPod touch in place of a reflective shield), and square off with the fire-breathing Hydra of Lerna in Nashville. A casino in Las Vegas stands in for the Island of the Lotus-Eaters, and the fabled Hollywood sign serves as a hidden gateway to Hades. (Irony much?) Wry pop culture references abound, giving the film a don’t-take-this-too-seriously attitude that appeals to viewers young and old.

It’s a smart, well-paced movie that deserves far better reviews than it’s received. Fans of Harry Potter or of Greek mythology in general will not be disappointed. There are a few changes to Rick Riordan’s source material, but they generally serve to add clarity.

At first glance, it sounds like there are a lot of worldview considerations – especially considering the whole issue of the “gods.” However, “Percy Jackson” neatly sidesteps any potential religious debates by making the Greek deities merely stand-ins for classic superheroes. They’re neither omnipotent nor omniscient, and really don’t come across as representatives of an anti-Christian worldview. Zeus and Poseidon really don’t wield any more power than Electro or Aquaman, and they struggle with very human weaknesses.

(It is worth noting, however, that the realm of Hades is a terrifying, Dante-esque vision of the biblical hell, not the quiet, shadowy otherworld portrayed in the original myths.)

Gods and superheroes aside, however, there are undeniably supernatural aspects to this film. Those who disagree with Harry Potter on principle probably shouldn’t see this movie. I personally didn’t find it offensive, but I can understand that some might.

My biggest criticism of “Percy Jackson” is not directed at its makers, but rather at the MPAA members who gave it a PG rating. This is quite possibly the “edgiest” PG movie I have ever seen. The violence and scary images are fast and furious, there’s a fair amount of language, and there are a few innuendoes tossed in as well. Don’t go into this movie thinking you’ll see something along the lines of “The Incredibles” or even the earlier Harry Potter movies – “Percy Jackson” is not suitable for children under the age of ten.

That said, however, it’s still a well-made, exciting movie. It definitely has its flaws, but most older viewers will not find them especially problematic. I would recommend “Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief” to teen and adult viewers who enjoy the Harry Potter series or are fans of Greek mythology.

It’s not perfect. But it’s still pretty good.

VERDICT: 8/10
An occasionally intense, but creative and well-executed, cinematic fantasy.

Normalized Score: 5.8

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 21, 2010 in Fantasy